[Fonte: GLP] Britain was once the world leader in biotechnology for agriculture, but that all changed 20 years ago when the environmental movement led a successful campaign to scare people about it. The EU enthusiastically joined in the opposition to biotech crops, not by banning them but by strangling them in red tape. Since 2005, the EU has approved just one transgenic variety of crop for commercial use, a process that took 13 years, by which time the crop was outdated. Canada has approved 70 in that time.In the CRISPR gene editing technique, the US has 872 patents, China 858 and the EU just 194.…The root of this Luddism is that … the EU adopted an extreme version of the “precautionary principle”, effectively stating that a new technique must prove itself to be safe, whereas the old technique it displaces need not do so. Thus organic farmers are free to use copper sulphate as an insecticide, even though it is described by the European Chemical Agency as “very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects, may cause cancer, may damage fertility or the unborn child… may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure.” Why? Because it was invented in the 1930s. But they are not free to use the insect-killing Bt gene, even though this has proven harmless to human beings all over the rest of the world in nearly three decades of use.
Read full, original article: One of the biggest Brexit prizes will be ditching the EU’s mindless precaution and innovation-crushing rules
Discussão sobre este post