Copa and Cogeca deeply regret the outcome of today’s vote on the draft report by MEP Inese Vaidere (EPP, Latvia) regarding the modification of customs duties on certain imports from Russia and Belarus, starting with fertilisers. Introducing trade defence measures without considering alternative plans and not considering their consequences on the agricultural sector is potentially devastating.
While recognising the clear political rationale behind the European Commission’s proposal, Copa and Cogeca strongly criticise the lack of amendments to the original text and the absence of any call for a proper impact assessment. Mitigating solutions and proposals for alternative sourcing were possible, as highlighted by the Agriculture Committee of the European Parliament. The decision to ignore them is particularly alarming, given the severe economic implications for European farmers and agricultural cooperatives.
The proposed increase in tariffs on fertilisers, although aligned with broader geopolitical sanctions, may significantly drive-up production costs at a time when fertilisers already represent one of the most substantial expenses for farmers. Without access to affordable fertilisers, farmers face shrinking competitiveness, declining incomes, and potential disruption affecting the EU food security.
Copa and Cogeca urgently call on Members of the European Parliament to reconsider the proposal during the upcoming mini-plenary session on 21–22 May. The agricultural sector must not be expected to bear the brunt of foreign policy decisions without adequate mitigation measures and a thorough impact analysis.
We reaffirm our support to the EU’s commitment to addressing geopolitical challenges. However, European farmers must not become collateral damage.
Fonte: Copa and Cogeca
