The CAP proposal is not a green-washing exercise
How can anyone claim that the CAP approved by the European Parliament this week represents greenwashing, when it means that European farmers and agri-cooperatives will have to rise to the following challenges:
- Allocating 30% of their support to eco-schemes, dedicated not only to the environment and climate but also including further improvements to animal welfare – which goes beyond the original proposal made by the Commission.
- Making viable progress through eco-schemes regarding actions concerning the climate, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing carbon sequestration, improving water quality, reducing soil erosion, reducing emissions, improving and protecting biodiversity, reducing the use of plant protection products, improving animal welfare, the nutrient management plan, improving animal and plant diversity and maintenance of wetlands and peatlands amongst others.
- Dedicating 10% of arable land to non-productive landscape elements that are beneficial to biodiversity. Only half of this target will receive support through eco-schemes and agri-environmental climate measures, the other half will be mandatory for all farmers, without further support.
- Receiving less support for areas with natural constraints – a vital part of rural areas – which only remain viable, socially vibrant and preserved through CAP funding.
- Maintaining permanent grassland on national, regional, sub-regional and holding levels with a maximum variation of 5% (without further support).
- Effectively protecting wetlands and peatlands (without further support).
- Implementing crop rotation without consideration of farm size, permanent crops and crops grown underwater (without further support).
- Implementing new statutory management requirements for water policy, for animal diseases and for sustainable use of pesticides (without further support).
How can anyone who has real in-the-field experience say that this is nothing, that this is upholding the status quo? If this CAP had not been supported by the European Parliament, no progress would have been made in the years to come! In spite of all the criticism, in spite of the complexity brought about by climate change, in spite of the low incomes, in spite of the severe impacts of Covid-19 and the upcoming Brexit deal – at the end of the day the reality is that farmers are constantly increasing their efforts.
With all due respect for certain activists, most of which have never experienced the reality of farming on the ground, we will continue to defend with determination a transition that reconciles agricultural production and environmental conservation for millions of EU farmers.
The messages and the incredible amount of misinformation on social media and in the press against the farming community have (deliberately) overstepped many limits, and we will respond to them in due time. Despite all the pressure and intimidations, MEPs have assumed a responsible position that will soon allow farmers to work within a clear framework and provide the stability necessary for them to plan ahead, invest and respond to societal demands while earning a living for themselves and their families.
I CLBHort: Material propagativo de espécies hortícolas – avanços e desafios futuros – 2 de Novembro 2017 – Lisboa
Os materiais propagativos são cruciais para a obtenção de produtos de qualidade que possam ser competitivos num mercado global. Nesta mesa redonda do I Congresso Luso-Brasileiro de Horticultura, […]
No passado dia 11 de dezembro, uma delegação do PCP, integrando o deputado Paulo Sá eleito pelo Algarve, reuniu com a Associação Nacional dos Criadores de Caprinos da Raça Algarvia (ANCCRAL), […]